 | | Re: The Fake Fossil (Was: Problems with Darwin's theory) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Kinda throws things into confusion, but it also reminds everyone to be wary. (...) Pretty much. If they want to seize on the small number of fakes, they'll have to answer to the large number of fake faith healers as a disproof of God. I don't (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Fake Fossil (Was: Problems with Darwin's theory) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) How is Larry's viewpoint necessarily Libertarian? Libertarians can espouse good science, but espousing good science (and freedom) is not necessarily Libertarian (though it can't hurt). :) best LFB (23 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Fake Fossil (Was: Problems with Darwin's theory) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I'm making the jump that this would not be an issue under Libertarian non-government schools. We'd have a bunch of scientific morons in the Creationist schools, which is why I say on the theoritical level. You are correct in my estimation that (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Fake Fossil (Was: Problems with Darwin's theory) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Bruce and Lindsay are both right. (...) Agreed. Although I would argue that it's more likely in some systems than others... (c.f. the wacky trait inheritance theories popular in the SovUnion under Stalin which were there to please him, supposedly) (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
