Subject:
|
Education (was: Amway/Quixtar/MLMs)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:38:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
142 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> I think, from a UK perspective, it is a good idea to aim to give kids an
> equal level of education. However, supplying equal $/head is a very
> simplistic way of doing this - unless we assume kids are a mass produced
> homogenous product. The cost of education will depend on a great many things
> - a good deal of them being nothing to do with the kids involved.
Ack! In the past you have repeatedly advocated that education should be doled
out in quantities proportional to the ability to learn. Now you are saying
that it should be equal. Just for clarity, which of these stances do you
actually agree with?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Education (was: Amway/Quixtar/MLMs)
|
| (...) I see no contradiction in what I am saying. I/you/we are mixing school/higher education. The UK system provides education up to the 16. It is required that parents provide their children with education - the default is the state system. Within (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Amway/Quixtar/MLMs
|
| (...) I think, from a UK perspective, it is a good idea to aim to give kids an equal level of education. However, supplying equal $/head is a very simplistic way of doing this - unless we assume kids are a mass produced homogenous product. The cost (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
