 | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Guy Albertelli
|
| | | (...) Schoolbooks due suffer from a variety of errors. This however is not because Darwinian Evolution is wrong, but rather because the people writing the books are more interested in selling them then getting their facts right. (...) For the same (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Tim Culberson
|
| | | | (...) So how can one say that issuing a misleading textbook without pointing out the BLATANT errors isn't misleading the student? (...) There are a heck of a lot less evidences to discredit the above theories compared to Evolution. (here's 20 to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Its Own Worst Enemy (was Re: Support for Creationism ) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) snipped from (URL) Questions for Evolutionists for the purposes of review and discussion. No challenge to the copyright status of this work is implied or should be inferred. (...) It does not evolve into a butterfly; the organism has the same (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | (...) Sounds like the Bible to me. Pot - kettle - black. (...) In the US? Damned straight I would - Separation of Church and State, remember? Now, if it were a PRIVATE school, more power to you. But if a public school that gets MY tax money, that (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
