 | | Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) And just because I found myself thinking about it, I earned over 190 hours credit in philosophy when in school... Wonder if I could get retroactive credit for all these Lugnet debates? Easily a term's worth of papers-- backed with the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —Jon Kozan
|
| | | | (...) Self-aggrandizement. (...) Not that I know the answer for this guy, but different colleges award credit hours differently. I've attended 4 colleges and they all used different measures of "credit hours". -Jon (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) So if DAVE says it, it's Self-aggrandizement, but if a Creationist says it about their credit hours in science, it's not, it's proof they know what they are talking about? Elaborate, please. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Not really... I was thinking about applying the same logic in reverse-- I.E. that if I studied philosophy whether I'd somehow earn your respect in my arguments. But you'll notice I didn't do that. I just thought about it for a minute. But if (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Well, "credit hours" made a certain amount of sense at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute where I attended. A 3 credit hour class (which was an "average" class) had 3 hours of lecture per week (courses with labs didn't reflect the lab time in (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) I guess I'm just stuck saying 'ick'... My instincts just tell me to measure courses by evaluated content, not time... But I spose if you wanted to measure it that way, I guess I can't say there isn't a logical reason behind it. Oh well... Oh, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | (...) You went to RPI? When? -Erik ECSE '94 (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) BS ECSE '85, Meng ECSE '89. Looks like we just missed... FUT: lugnet.people Frank (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Creditability... —Erik Olson
|
| | | | (...) By an even narrower margin -- I was class of '93 until I went on co-op. Have you visited there recently? I've got some photos of the new Approach here. (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Creditability... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Ahh, then we could have seen each other in passing. I was occaisionally on campus in fall of '99 (like I went to interviews, also did a few outings with the outings club). (...) here. Haven't visited since summer of '91, and even that wasn't (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
