Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:30:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1234 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Guy Albertelli writes:
> Unlikely, very unlikely. But definately possible. And if you told me that
> there were !many! trucks crashing, and one time you found the model fully
> contructed, I would find your staement likely.
I wouldn't.
Basically, what it boils down to is predictable fractal behavior. Although
still random-looking, the system follows very consistant patterns. For
example, imagine fractal-generated landscapes. Or basically just imagine
'possible' coastlines. Would you believe it if there was a coastline that
was PERFECTLY straight for 100 miles then turned at a PERFECT 90 degree
angle, and went straight another 100 miles? While yes, there's nothing
strictly preventing the system from behaving in such a way, it's not within
the behavioral patterns of the system. However, I WOULD believe it to be
MUCH more likely that a perfect replica of the US coastline was duplicated--
just because that pattern DOES follow the same 'patterns' of behavior
exhibited by coastlines... And to clarify, I'm not saying it's IMPOSSIBLE,
but that I wouldn't believe it to be likely, even if you ran the
'experiment' a googol plex times.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) I have always been curious how "literal" readers of the bible reconcile the 2 different stories of creation in Genesis? (...) That is right. I would suggest you take a look a fractal mathematics, and celluar automata theory to see how very (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|