To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8816
8815  |  8817
Subject: 
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:47:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1564 times
  
Jon Kozan wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:

In fact the odds are so _not_ with [life's formation] (about 1 in 10 with 50,
give or take 10, zeros chance) that we could never have come into being
without some other force/being/etc behind it.

Exactly!  And evolution is that force!

  More precisely, where are you getting those figures?  It differs markedly
from the estimations for number of inhabitable planets in the galaxy, much
less the universe.


(It's Friday, so I have time to do this :-))

Evolution is not a force - it's:
a) a theory, involving
b) random chance

Random chance cannot product life.

Prove it (what's that?  We've said time and time again you can't prove a negative?)



the odds are just too far much.

And just EXACTLY where are you getting these odds?  Have you calculated them?


Indeed
today's leading edge evolution scientists have either a) ceased discussing the
random chance and time tenants of evolution since they don't work out; or b)
claim that because they don't, we must have come from an alien race (another
intelligent life form)

We didn't even have to come from an INTELLIGENT life form.  Bacteria/viruses in
extraterrestrial matter could have evolved into us IF we didn't evolve from base
elements here.



--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) 50, (...) markedly (...) negative?) (...) the (...) in (...) base (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) (It's Friday, so I have time to do this :-)) Evolution is not a force - it's: a) a theory, involving b) random chance Random chance cannot product life. the odds are just too far much. Indeed today's leading edge evolution scientists have (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR