| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) Balance snipped. Out of curiousity, Larry, do you think anyone other than you or Scott really cares about any of this? If it is all plowed ground, why post it all again? Is it so necessary for you to feel good about your debating technique (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) As he enjoys playing to the crowd. (...) I _feel_ the contrary. I have promised many times to leave LP alone - if he does the same with me. However, I feel he just can't resist taking a shot at me. Look at this thread the message he just (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) Is it necessary to make this a conditional promise? Can't each involved party rise to the moral high ground and ignore the other? (...) That comes from driving on the wrong side of the road and using that crazy metric system of yours. 8^) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) Call it MAD (mutually assured destruction). (...) Ah Dave very topical. Thirt years on, some of us Brits have still not went metric: Grocer trial told of 'metric threat' (URL) the US, you have your gun debate we have this! Scott A (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) After Scott beat me up for not answering it. Not just once or twice, either. Make up your mind, Scott, did you want it answered or not? ++Lar (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
|
(...) What are your thoughts on this? Are you willing to set aside your snide remarks? (...) Larry, It goes without saying that there many questions which on which Id like to hear you opinions. Such as: (URL) I re-stated again the question to you (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|