Subject:
|
Mention Hitler? You lose (was Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 1999 19:47:59 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM./spamless/com
|
Viewed:
|
750 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 May 1999 15:17:44 GMT, Lee Jorgensen <ljorgensen@uswest.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Mr L F Braun wrote:
> >
> > <snipped>
> >
> > WELL SAID!
> >
> > The only thing you didn't reference was Hitler's confiscation of
> > guns as the precursor to WW2.
>
> If he did that, he would have lost the argument by default.
>
> Steve
Right, that's why I didn't either. Wish the other side had brought it up
first. <grin> (1) It's true, though. I worked it in via the Custer
reference. Tyrants disarm populations. That's what they do. If you are
living somewhere that is trying to disarm you, check your premises.
1 - for the newbies in the audience, Usenet tradition (2) holds that the
first side in an argument to mention Hitler or Nazis loses the argument,
since it's such a stock invokation.
2 - which probably applies here, can we have a ruling on that, Todd? Or
is it a "norms of the group" thing? In that case, I for one say it does,
any dissenters?
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
