Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 May 1999 19:54:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
672 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 13 May 1999 15:07:00 GMT, Lee Jorgensen <ljorgensen@uswest.net>
wrote:
> If the government deems is necessary to take away that amendement,
> what's to stop them from taking away the first amendment, or the
> fifth amendment? Nothing.
There's already nothing to stop them from overruling any of the amendments.
I don't see your argument.
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) There's a specific procedure for overruling an amendment. One that no congresscritter, no matter how liberal, has the guts to try to initiate. Unfortunately, nothing can prevent them from working towards the same goal with stupid little (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) I would have to agree with Mike. The biggest problem with gun legislation, is that it's in the second amendment of the US Constitution. Spelled out specifically. If the government deems is necessary to take away that amendement, what's to stop (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
