Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 May 1999 19:53:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
706 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 13 May 1999 15:11:15 GMT, "Christopher L. Weeks"
<c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote:
> Why does law enforcement primarily deal with after-the-fact
> repercussions, rather than preventative measures? I know of several
> instances in which potential future illegal actions were reported to
> police and blown off because nothing had happened. I see this as very strange.
I believe it has something to do with the fact that the police are only
*supposed* to be involved in situations where a crime has been committed.
No crime, no punishment.
Can you imagine what would happen if citizens could be punished because
they potentially *considered* performing a criminal act? We'd all be in
prison.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <373b2d40.4308071@lu...et.com>... (...) strange. (...) If our country wasn't over run by this "its not a crime unless convicted" mentality I might find this argument credible. However, so much crime occurs because it is (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) For the record, I think that my beliefs are subject to change, but others have tried to convince me and it hasn't happened on this issue. (...) This is the key practical point, as far as I see it. (...) And this is the key ethical point which (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
