Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 May 1999 18:21:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
754 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 1999 22:20:20 GMT, James Brown uttered the following
profundities...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Dee writes:
> <snipped several pointed questions about gun control>
> > I cannot explain coherently or eloquently the next point. *I*
> > know what I am trying to say, I just cannot quite explain it!
> >
> > One last thing, pertaining to the notion of people kill people,
> > though I cannot quote a source, it has been proven, from a
> > psychological standpoint, that guns *do* kill. If faced with a
> > situation where violence might be used, the weaponry available
> > to the individual will dramatically alter the life expectancy
> > of the person on the receiving end. Reactions to different
> > forms of attack, and the ability to counter different forms
> > of attack will increase the survivability of that attack. A gun
> > doesn't so easily enable an individual to have second thoughts
> > about an action. One has a higher probability of dying from
> > a gunshot than being stabbed. One might need to stab more than
> > once, or should one strangle.....I give up. I cannot explain
> > it! A goodly proportion of murder is "crime of passion." The
> > methods available to act upon a shock that leads to it, alter
> > the survivability chances of the victim.
>
> How about: People react to a dangerous situation depending on a number of
> factors, one of which is their knowledge of their capabilities. If a person
> is aware they have a gun, they are more likely to use it, because their
> subconscious mind will add it to the list of viable options in a crisis.
>
> Or: When a person is acting out of surprise or shock-reaction, they are not in
> a position to consider the potential outcomes of a situtation calmly. They
> are primarily concerned with resolution, and will use whatever means are
> available to provide that resolution. The "fatality" of any given solution is
> unlikely to be a factor in crisis-thinking, and the presence of such solutions
> will increase the likelyhood of a fatality.
>
> James
> http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
Thank you. That was along the lines of what I had hoped to
convey.
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site: http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071 AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit: http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model? http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Dee writes: <snipped several pointed questions about gun control> (...) How about: People react to a dangerous situation depending on a number of factors, one of which is their knowledge of their capabilities. If (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
