Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 May 1999 16:18:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@NEWSGUYspamcake.COM
|
Viewed:
|
661 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 1999 15:07:00 GMT, Lee Jorgensen <ljorgensen@uswest.net>
> wrote:
>
> > If the government deems is necessary to take away that amendement,
> > what's to stop them from taking away the first amendment, or the
> > fifth amendment? Nothing.
>
> There's already nothing to stop them from overruling any of the amendments.
> I don't see your argument.
There's a specific procedure for overruling an amendment. One that no
congresscritter, no matter how liberal, has the guts to try to
initiate.
Unfortunately, nothing can prevent them from working towards the same
goal with stupid little regulations that, ultimately, will have little
effect on people who are already not paying attention to the law.
Sure, they can make it close to impossible (or at least very
inconvenient) for ME to buy a gun or ammunition. They can do very
little to stop gang members or other crooks from doing the same.
Or has the farce of prohibition been forgotten already?
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
