Subject:
|
Re: Religion and Science
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 01:33:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1062 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Wilson writes:
> Polyamory is something suited to some people, certainly not
> all, probably not most:
Why do you say probably not most?
> but most people never even consider it because it's
> outside the social norm.
Right. I'm sure that if you polled people, you would find that right now they
believed that such a lifestyle is not for them. But I wonder if they're just
wrong because we're conditioned to only accept monogamy.
> No family structure is the best for everyone, and
> choices ought to be available rather than cut off for no good reason.
That is my philosophy of life. Not just in some kind of sexual context, but in
everything. As long as you're not hurting someone, then go for it.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Religion and Science
|
| Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) I was thinking of people-as-we-are-now, not people-as-we-might-possibly-be :-) Rightnow, almost everyone is brought up on the ideal of monogamy (eg all the teenage angst material about "my best friend (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Religion and Science
|
| Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) happily (...) (or (...) Exactly Dave. Polyamory is something suited to some people, certainly not all, probably not most: but most people never even consider it because it's outside the social norm. No family (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
