To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7955
7954  |  7956
Subject: 
Re: Religion and Science
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:11:32 GMT
Viewed: 
3268 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > > > That is why I can fully believe in His words.  Other prophets are conduits and are
> > > > > subject to human error and fallibility.  Jesus was unique.  I am not necessarily
> > > > > negating other prophets and their messages (unless they actively deny Jesus' deity).
> > > > 
> > > > Again, this does not address my question.  It just makes a claim, but offers
> > > > no reason to accept it over any other claim beyond that you believe it.
> > > 
> > > Maybe I have no reason to convince you to accept it over others.
> > 
> > Then perhaps you shouldn't have made the claims you did.
> > 
> > 
> > > As I mentioned before, I
> > > condemn no other religion (qualify: which asserts monotheism), unless it actively *denies*
> > > Christianity.
> > 
> > And the other guys are saying the exact same thing (and Christianity
> > *denies* them).  So, again, why should I believe one over the other?  And
> > let me note that your qualifier means you actively condemn Hinduism
> > (polytheism) and Buddhism (which says you can believe in whatever gods you
> > want to, but that implies polytheism is okay).  This means the only
> > remaining major religion that you don't condemn is Mohammadism.  And that
> > one doesn't admit that Jesus is God - I don't know if that counts as a
> > denial of Christianity.
> 
>   Ack, "Muhammadism" is a lousy term.  It's a coinage of 18/19th-C.
>   Orientalism, designed to denigrate Islam by reducing it to its
>   Prophet.  Muslims don't believe Muhammad was a (er, the) deity.

Busted!  Yeah, I know better.  Just running off at the keyboard with those
pre-programmed terms.  I'll also vary between Mahomet, Mohamad, Mohammad and
other variations if you look close.


>   They *do* deny Jesus's inherent divinity, but not his divine
>   inspiration.  The importance to them is that Muhammad was the
>   *last* Prophet of God, and so carries the "final build", if you
>   will, of His Word.  I'm not sure Islam denies Christianity,
>   however--they refer to Christians as "people of the Book."
>   Misguided people, but honestly so, and thus still kin.

Jesus is a prophet of God, just not the most important one.  Since
Christianity is based on the divinity of Christ, they deny it in a sense.  I
meant that more as John may regard that as a denial, not so much what
Muslims believe.  Anyway, your expansion on what I said is accurate so far
as my understanding goes (for anyone reading this and unfamiliar with the
Islamic faith).

> 
>   Islam has the great attractions that its only holy book was
>   most definitely written by one person (although again, 'from
>   the mouth of God').  The historical records are also a heck
>   of a lot better, although the miracle issue is just as foggy.
> 
>   So that leaves (maybe) the Jews and Muslims...oh, and the
>   Zoroastrians.  They're probably OK too. :)  (Yes, there are
>   still some around--about a hundred thousand, in Iraq and Iran.)

I wasn't counting the Jews or Zoroastrians as a major religion (in terms of
number of followers).  Animism abounds, but I don't know of a single major
religion that typifies it.  I like the cosmic balance bit from Zorastrians:
there is good and evil in the world, and we get to tip the balance in one
direction or the other by our actions.  But then again, I like the bit about
dieing with a sword in my hand and cavorting with valkyries....

-->Bruce<--

> 
>   best
> 
>   LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Religion and Science
 
(...) Ack, "Muhammadism" is a lousy term. It's a coinage of 18/19th-C. Orientalism, designed to denigrate Islam by reducing it to its Prophet. Muslims don't believe Muhammad was a (er, the) deity. They *do* deny Jesus's inherent divinity, but not (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR