To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7794
7793  |  7795
Subject: 
Re: Libertopia - unproven theory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:23:00 GMT
Viewed: 
219 times
  
Missed a point...

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
I haven't seen any coverts on either side of any of those discussions.

Frank Filz. But that was a while back.

(assuming you meant "converts"... you're not *supposed* to see "coverts",
that's why they're covert. Me, I think Scott Arthur is secretly a LP member
and doesn't want to admit it. :-) :-) :-) )

Does backing away from/refining(1) a position count? There's been some of that.

1 - the other side backs away, your side refines. Hence I refined my
positions on a few things lately.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertopia - unproven theory
 
(...) Thanks! (...) [snip] (...) Not in my dictionary. Still == remains to be. [snip] (...) I agree, but this debate, along with abortion and Lego vs. Legos, have been beat to death. I haven't seen any coverts on either side of any of those (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR