Subject:
|
Re: Libertopia - unproven theory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:23:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
253 times
|
| |
|
|
Missed a point...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
> I haven't seen any coverts on either side of any of those discussions.
Frank Filz. But that was a while back.
(assuming you meant "converts"... you're not *supposed* to see "coverts",
that's why they're covert. Me, I think Scott Arthur is secretly a LP member
and doesn't want to admit it. :-) :-) :-) )
Does backing away from/refining(1) a position count? There's been some of that.
1 - the other side backs away, your side refines. Hence I refined my
positions on a few things lately.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Libertopia - unproven theory
|
| (...) Thanks! (...) [snip] (...) Not in my dictionary. Still == remains to be. [snip] (...) I agree, but this debate, along with abortion and Lego vs. Legos, have been beat to death. I haven't seen any coverts on either side of any of those (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
