Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Nov 2000 02:33:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1137 times
|
| |
|
|
FUT lugnet.off-topic.useless-annoyance
"Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message
news:G4osvM.Br7@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> > If you look at www.m-w.com for the verb form of "blame", you will find a
> > dictionary that is not screwed up.
>
> By which I you mean, I imagine, a dictionary that agrees with your
> definition. Fair enough, but I think you haven't found such a dictionary • yet.
> Even that "not screwed up" dictionary identifies the verb form of "to • blame" as:
>
> 2 a : to hold responsible <they blame me for everything> b : to place
> responsibility for <blames it on me>
>
> How does that differ from John Neal's citation?
>
> Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Are we to understand, then, that a posting in disagreement with your view is nothing but an annoyance? If so, then please come out and state it clearly. If not, please explain what you mean, and while you're at it let us know why you're (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) By which I you mean, I imagine, a dictionary that agrees with your definition. Fair enough, but I think you haven't found such a dictionary yet. Even that "not screwed up" dictionary identifies the verb form of "to blame" as: 2 a : to hold (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
