Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:14:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
952 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> If you look at www.m-w.com for the verb form of "blame", you will find a
> dictionary that is not screwed up.
By which I you mean, I imagine, a dictionary that agrees with your
definition. Fair enough, but I think you haven't found such a dictionary yet.
Even that "not screwed up" dictionary identifies the verb form of "to blame" as:
2 a : to hold responsible <they blame me for everything> b : to place
responsibility for <blames it on me>
How does that differ from John Neal's citation?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| FUT lugnet.off-topic.use...-annoyance "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G4osvM.Br7@lugnet.com... (...) yet. (...) blame" as: (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| If you look at www.m-w.com for the verb form of "blame", you will find a dictionary that is not screwed up. "John Neal" <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:3A11ED4A.689B2C...est.net... (...) designation of (...) can be (...) population." (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
