To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7291
7290  |  7292
Subject: 
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:12:49 GMT
Viewed: 
999 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
That is not something that I can answer quickly.

I can respect that.

I feel very strongly that certain crimes do indeed warrant death, but
I am willing to reconsider the
part that mercy should play in a criminal justice system.

I don't know the tenets of your religion very well, having never agreed with
them.  But is it your job to mete out that kind of justice according to
Christianity?  I thought Christ admonished you to turn the other cheek and let
God deal with that kind of Justice.

That is indeed a principle tenent of the faith.  I won't lie to you that I have
questions as to how the balance of mercy/judgment must be applied by the state
(whatever political state it might be).  I think that the criminal justice
system has a responsibility to be consistent...I think that the governed enter
into a social contract with the government in which there is an implicit
understanding the we relinquish to the state our "right" to have crimes against
us redressed.  We defer judgment, so to speak, to the body of government.  It
may be a person's perogative to forgive an assault, for instance, but is it in
the best interests of society (even one's neighbors) to allow criminals to go
unpunished?  I'd rather hold someone accountable to violence done to me, so
that, at the very least, the criminal won't commit the same act against someone
else.  That seems a legitimate way to love my neighbor. Again, consistency...a
justice system must be consistent to be just.  You may very well be right that
it is wrong to administer the death penalty.  Philosophically, I have my
questions about that, but I'm certainly open to becoming anti-death penalty, for
lack of a better phrase.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) someone (...) Wow. I don't buy your arguments for many things, but this was good! Really. You basically used the same logic that I use for why it's OK to use lethal force to defend your home. Hmmm. (...) for (...) How (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) I can respect that. (...) I don't know the tenets of your religion very well, having never agreed with them. But is it your job to mete out that kind of justice according to Christianity? I thought Christ admonished you to turn the other cheek (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR