Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:30:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2539 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
> It
> may be a person's perogative to forgive an assault, for instance, but is it in
> the best interests of society (even one's neighbors) to allow criminals to go
> unpunished? I'd rather hold someone accountable to violence done to me, so
> that, at the very least, the criminal won't commit the same act against • someone
> else. That seems a legitimate way to love my neighbor.
Wow. I don't buy your arguments for many things, but this was good! Really.
You basically used the same logic that I use for why it's OK to use lethal
force to defend your home. Hmmm.
> justice system must be consistent to be just. You may very well be right that
> it is wrong to administer the death penalty. Philosophically, I have my
> questions about that, but I'm certainly open to becoming anti-death penalty, • for
> lack of a better phrase.
How about...hmm...maybe...pro-life?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
