Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:31:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
594 times
|
| |
|
|
Chirs, there are tons of people who don't agree with or understand
"rights-based calculus" but we don't exclude them from their rights.
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message
news:G3v0Fx.GMC@lugnet.com...
> conception).) Some people suggest that the rights-based calculus can't • begin
> until that "click" since rights don't apply to something that can't • understand
> the very concept.
>
> Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) There are tons of sentients (not people) who are excluded from the possesion of rights. When this is justified, the arguments are typically based on the fact that they're dumber than us, religious dictate, or something seemingly undefinable (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Meaningful way? It sounds like you're defining something other than life. Evidence includes the fact that carrots are alive and never have brain function. (...) I don't get the whole life befins argument. Isn't it obvious that life never (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
