Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:58:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
687 times
|
| |
|
|
Uh oh where'd he go? I can't find this other post, though I disagreed
strongly when I read it.
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G3rzwM.3H5@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> As for this assertion from your other post:
>
> > I do not understand why they do not come right out and say - "we'll make
> > the rich richer, and the poor poorer".
I could have sworn that was one of the current improprieties of
"society".
I think the Libertarians should come out and say, "We'll make the free
freeer, we'll make the wrongly incarcerated free, we'll make the wrongfully
enslaved free (from US tyranny), we'll make those who work earn rewards and
those who don't work earn nothing."
You seem to prefer rewarding people who steal the freedom and trample the
rights of others. You haven't shown any solutions that address any of this,
and certainly nothing that changes the true old cliche about rich and poor.
If you can't discover why that cliche is true, then you don't deserve any
help. I won't argue with you anymore either, I have written plenty about
why your so-called solutions are a joke and why Libertarian solutions will
work, when they are given the mandate by the people to do so. Larry has
done the same, but of course more clearly.
> the simple answer (why the LP does not come right out and say that) is
> because it's not true. You're trying to foment class warfare with that
> comment, but there is no basis in truth for it, none whatsoever.
>
> This thread is a waste of time, as you're an uncritical thinker. Feel free
> to have the last word, though, via some snide comment or another, as I'm
> done with it.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I see two fundamental understandings of humanity which are the barriers to understanding the Libertarian perspective (and these really are almost a single fundamental understanding): 1. The understanding that humans are basically good. The (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) One must remeber that that when one talks about freedom of choice, it assumes one has a choice. Many in society may not be able to choose a better school for their kids, or heathcare for their family as the lack resourses (not just money) to (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Plowed ground. Every point you marked with "=+=" has already been answered in this very newsgroup, by me or others. I am not going to do your homework for you and provide all the references as I have neither the time nor the interest. Go read (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
