Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:45:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
582 times
|
| |
| |
Thanks James
"James Simpson" <jsimpson@rice.edu> wrote in message
news:G3s19p.7CB@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
> >
> > > > My rotten traitorous wife voted for Gore because she doesn't want Roe v. Wade
> > > > overturned. ;-)
> >
> > > > For some of us that IS the issue which overrides everything else in this
> > > > election!
> >
> > > You're absolutely right! Some of us want that law overturned! ;^ Anyway, I'm
> > > not trying to start an abortion debate...only making my voice heard.
> >
> > Yes indeed. It would be a terrible shame if women retained sovereignty
> > over their own bodies.
>
> I cringe at the thought of the lengths of a thread encompassing an abortion-
> debate. I made my abortion comment because I do not want this forum to be a
> place where "minority" or dissenting viewpoints (such as mine) are not
> tolerated. For my part, I will be glad to debate this issue to the nth degree,
> although I doubt that it shall serve to change any minds on either side. Thus
> said, I will reply to you in brief:
>
> While it is true that a woman may do as she pleases with her own body, it does
> not therefore follow that she may do as she see's fit with her baby's body. If
> a conception is the result of an un-coerced freely-made consent to sexual
> intercourse, then, yes, a woman's sovereign control of her body must indeed be
> limited by the right of the life within her to exist and grow to the maturity of
> personhood and sentience which are latent within that new life. That's my two-
> dollar bill.
>
> James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I don't want to add fuel to a debate over the right to choice either since I'm certain no one's viewpoint will be swayed, but I would like some clarification. Are you thanking James for expressing an opinion with which you agree? If that is (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I cringe at the thought of the lengths of a thread encompassing an abortion- debate. I made my abortion comment because I do not want this forum to be a place where "minority" or dissenting viewpoints (such as mine) are not tolerated. For my (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|