Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:19:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
675 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> Uh oh where'd he go? I can't find this other post, though I disagreed
> strongly when I read it.
>
> "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> news:G3rzwM.3H5@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > As for this assertion from your other post:
> >
> > > I do not understand why they do not come right out and say - "we'll make
> > > the rich richer, and the poor poorer".
>
> I could have sworn that was one of the current improprieties of
> "society".
> I think the Libertarians should come out and say, "We'll make the free
> freeer, we'll make the wrongly incarcerated free, we'll make the wrongfully
> enslaved free (from US tyranny), we'll make those who work earn rewards and
> those who don't work earn nothing."
One must remeber that that when one talks about freedom of choice, it
assumes one has a choice. Many in society may not be able to choose a better
school for their kids, or heathcare for their family as the lack resourses
(not just money) to do so.
> You seem to prefer rewarding people who steal the freedom and trample the
> rights of others.
Who said that?
> You haven't shown any solutions that address any of this,
> and certainly nothing that changes the true old cliche about rich and poor.
I get the felling that if $$ is saved from say education, they want to hand
it back to taxpayers - why not use it to make eduaction even better?
> If you can't discover why that cliche is true, then you don't deserve any
> help. I won't argue with you anymore either, I have written plenty about
> why your so-called solutions are a joke
I love your objectivity.
These are jokes:
New poll: One-third of voters crave "alternative" to government schools
Fatality fumble: Football kills as many students as school shootings
Police arrest more people for marijuana than murder, rape, and robbery combined
> and why Libertarian solutions will
> work, when they are given the mandate by the people to do so.
Time will tell I suppose. Right now you are about 50,000,000 votes short.
> Larry has
> done the same, but of course more clearly.
>
> > the simple answer (why the LP does not come right out and say that) is
> > because it's not true. You're trying to foment class warfare with that
> > comment, but there is no basis in truth for it, none whatsoever.
> >
> > This thread is a waste of time, as you're an uncritical thinker.
...and I thought the problem was that I was critical.
Scott A
> Feel free
> > to have the last word, though, via some snide comment or another, as I'm
> > done with it.
> >
> > ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| Uh oh where'd he go? I can't find this other post, though I disagreed strongly when I read it. "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G3rzwM.3H5@lugnet.com... (...) I could have sworn that was one of the current (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
