Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:56:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2328 times
|
| |
|
|
tut tut Larry, you snipped my message to bits and did not answer my points,
who unlike you ;)
I like hear you views here:
=+=
> I disagree with the implication. I've explained why in the past. But even if
> it's true, across the board, no matter what sort of society you construct,
> which I again dispute I claim that a society based on individual rights, in
> which *everyone* acts in their own enlightened self interest, results in the
> most justice and fairness for all. Again, plowed ground.
I doubt it. Those at the lower end of society will be further marginalised.
=+=
and here:
=+=
> 1. I've shown in the past why that it indeed would be the case that people
> would give and give generously, and further, that the dollars contributed
> voluntarily would be used more effectively than the ones extracted.
"generously" - very vauge. In percentage terms, what does it mean to you?
=+=
and here:
=+=
> > Personally, I quite happy to be a member of
> > society, and contribute to it passively and actively.
>
> So am I. And I think my contributions, allocated by me, are more effective
> than yours, allocated by bureaucrats.
More effective in reaching your goals, perhaps. As for those of greater
society, I doubt it.
=+=
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Plowed ground. Every point you marked with "=+=" has already been answered in this very newsgroup, by me or others. I am not going to do your homework for you and provide all the references as I have neither the time nor the interest. Go read (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Isn't what you actually mean "I don't have any refutation"? (...) You're right. I choose being a part of society. What about you? I'd say that if we take a survey of your posts here (not a scientific metric!!!) on Lugnet, you're probably going (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
