 | | The artist hasn't the courage of his convictions? (was Re: The Censors have won. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) My goodness that *does* miss the point. I don't know whether anyone else who was engaged in honest dialog about whether violence against fantasy characters was useful/appropriate/good fun or not was asking for change, but *I* never asked for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The artist hasn't the courage of his convictions? (was Re: The Censors have won. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) 1/2 disagree. By stating publicly that you didn't like it and weren't going to let your kids look at it, you *are* asking for change. (Not a change in what has already occurred, but a change in the future.) Otherwise, why bother to say (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The artist hasn't the courage of his convictions? (was Re: The Censors have won. —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I guess I would sort of agree with Todd, in that when one makes a public statement about how they dislike something, that they hope it will have a an effect. However, this does NOT consitute censorship. To me, this is the way change should be (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The artist hasn't the courage of his convictions? (was Re: The Censors have won. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Fair enough. If you think that my opinion matters to others, that is. I'm not sure that my likes and dislikes ought to be taken into account to the point of restricting the actions of others. ++Lar (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
