To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6265
6264  |  6266
Subject: 
Re: Are humans animals? Are humans MORE than animals?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 10:57:54 GMT
Viewed: 
729 times
  
Christopher Weeks wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Yes, Yes...
> > 
> > That hunting/eating/cockfighting thread is huge and hard to navigate.
> 
> Yup, sorry.  It has basically imploded due to the weight and complexity.
> 
> > However Dave Schuler said this:
> > 
> > " If you can produce an animal that generally demonstrates free will, I won't
> > eat it. "
> > 
> > which I think is the crux.
> 
> OK, I happen to disagree...maybe...but I'll play along.
> 
> > I've been watching for a while and I sense some
> > thrashing and some hostility. Play nice, people!
> 
> I have been frustrated, but didn't think I was hostile.  If I'm wrong, I
> apologize to the victim(s).  OTOH, I'm not sure how to tell you that you're
> evil without getting on some peoples' nerves.  I used to breed and raise show
> rats and was on a couple rat-themed mailing lists and tried to explain it to
> them too.  It went something like this (and this isn't directed at anyone here
> in particular):
> 
> You belive things that I disagree with.  Strongly.  So much, that I think your
> actions are, to whatever extent this is meaningful, evil.  I understand that it
> is because you were raised by wolves, and I don't fully fault you.  And, more
> importantly, just because I think that you are grievously wrong, doesn't mean
> that I can't get along with you in a civil conversation.  We might even be
> friends in the real world.
> 
> Most people thought it was just arrogant.  But I got a couple who thought it
> was interesting and thanked me, for whatever that's worth.  In any case, that
> is the context in which my claims of righteousness should be taken.  I guess I
> don't think that evil is as bad as most people do.

I'd have to agree with the majority - it's arrogant as hell to call meat eaters
evil just because you think we don't have to do it.  I assert we DO have to, our
bodies work better metabolically with meat in the diet.  And I DO have to eat meat
in order to enjoy myself in life.  You go ahead and shovel tasteless grass into
your mouth all your life, I think you're evil for classifying "us meateaters" as
evil.


--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Are humans animals? Are humans MORE than animals?
 
(...) eaters (...) It's not think...it's know. And I can live with that. (...) I think that is foolish and unrealistic. (...) Our, who? Not mine. I lost weight, gained muscle, seemed to improve my immunodefense and became generally more healthy. I (...) (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Are humans animals? Are humans MORE than animals?
 
(...) Yup, sorry. It has basically imploded due to the weight and complexity. (...) OK, I happen to disagree...maybe...but I'll play along. (...) I have been frustrated, but didn't think I was hostile. If I'm wrong, I apologize to the victim(s). (...) (26 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR