 | | Re: Harry Potter and young people's books
|
|
(...) Why is this a "debate" topic? Seems to me personal preference is just that, preference, not a debatable thing. So this thread belongs in .fun. Can we debate that? :-) (...) I would go with the Heinlein juveniles as a group. "Have spacesuit, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter and young people's books
|
|
(...) Well for heaven's sake - why didn't you redirect this to .fun then? Shazam - there we go. (...) A libertarian writer, it figures. :-) I liked his juvenile books better than his "adult" books. Double Star and Citizen of the Galaxy come to mind. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter and young people's books
|
|
(...) Not now, it's in .fun now...good going Lar! (...) favorite (...) The bulk of this list is reasonable to classify as juvenile literature, but I've also included some non-juvenile at the end that I think is especially good for kids. You (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter and young people's books
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Christopher L. Weeks writes: Oh, and I forgot _Dune_ by Frank Herbert. Chris (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter and young people's books
|
|
(...) I think you forgot the corpus of Asimov short stories--they made a huge impression upon me as a teen, when the stories were already 25 years old, because the lessons and principles are really timeless. They've collected the stories into (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
