To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6128
6127  |  6129
Subject: 
Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 23:30:37 GMT
Viewed: 
1447 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Thompson writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

Here is where we diverge a bit. I'm not a vegetarian and never will be. I see
it as OK to eat meat of non sentient creatures, and I see it as a difference
of kind, not degree. We genetically are omnivores, not herbivores.

How do we define 'sentient?'   Is it different to eat a chicken than
it would be to eat Koko the sign-language-using gorilla?

In kind? No. In degree, yes. At least I think so. I'm not much in the mood for
gorilla meat but I've seen chickens perform tricks. Not as elaborate ones,
mind you.

I guess I'm saying I'm not sure gorillas are sentient. But then, I'm not sure
some humans are either. Not that I'm in the mood for long pork, mind you...

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
 
(...) How do we define 'sentient?' Is it different to eat a chicken than it would be to eat Koko the sign-language-using gorilla? -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily?" (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR