Subject:
|
Re: How big is to big?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:03:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
338 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Wow. Can you get...nevermind.
>
> Sadly, Virgin has exited the condom business, per an article in the most
> recent but one Fortune magazine on the world's working billionaires (Branson
> being the top or among the top from the UK).
>
> It seems the marketeers were having some trouble with slogans. :-)
I bet.
> As an aside, remember, planes are way safer than autos on a per passenger mile
> basis. It's just that when they crash, it's news round the world. Ma and Pa
> Jones buying it in a fiery crash on the NJ turnpike doesn't typically make
> headlines in Essex UK, just Essex NJ.
I bet an accident on the NJT that killed 500 people would make international
news!
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How big is to big?
|
| (...) So, (...) He's a corporate flack? :-) Seriously, bigger planes do mean some changes required at the gates to load/unload but also, since the number of slots is fixed unless you build more runways and since runways cost a lot more to build than (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
