To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6106
6105  |  6107
Subject: 
Re: How big is to big?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:14:17 GMT
Reply-To: 
ssgore@superonline.NOMORESPAMcom
Viewed: 
216 times
  
Erin Windross wrote:

How big is to big? Sure I realize that many people need to get from point a to
point b, but what happens when so many of them are cramped into one airplane?
Picture yourself on the A3XX, flying at a safe altitude, all of a sudden a
bomb goes off in the lugage compartment, and this two deck airliner comes
crashing to the ground bringing more than 700 people to their deaths. It would
probably be the worst disaster in history!


Maybe the worst "aircraft disaster", since the biggest I know had a 500+
death total (crashing 747s on the ground).

Now that plane, ship, train, and auto makers keep making things larger with
more capcity, there is more room for something to go wrong. Would you feel
safe on a two deck airplane that carries the most passengers in the world? I
wouldn't...

Why? I can't see anything that decreases the safety when compared the
dying with 100 other people and dying with 600 other people..:-)

Selçuk



Message is in Reply To:
  How big is to big?
 
(exert taken from CNN article) "(CNN) -- The challenge for the travel industry in the next century is to accommodate an anticipated boom in tourism and commuting -- and to do so in style. Specialists say to expect bigger planes, larger ships, faster (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR