Subject:
|
Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 May 2000 14:53:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1169 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Were I to resort to eating any animals (legal consequences aside) humans would
> be equally appealing. (Except that I might have some illogical societal
> conditioning against it even though I know that logically they are morally
> equivalent activities.)
Just to pursue this to a morbid conclusion, you would therefore have no
compunctions against sexual relations with any animal you found suitably
attractive, and you would likewise be as willing to donate an organ to any
animal (antigen issues aside, in this hypothetical example) that needed it?
So if my dog needs a kidney or a bone marrow transplant, and you're the most
compatible donor, would you volunteer?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
| OK, hopefully the kiddies are kept away from l.o-t.d (...) would (...) I would apply the same standards that I do to humans...we must both be willing and interested. There is nothing wrong with inter-species copulation when both (all?) parteners are (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
| (...) that's (...) Right. And that is, in fact, what I believe. But I assumed by "full cannibal" you meant that I would eat human but no other meat. That idea can't be logically derived from what I wrote. Were I to resort to eating any animals (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
