To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5625
5624  |  5626
Subject: 
Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 10 May 2000 20:29:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2685 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Oh please. Do the math. To me, "flooding" means a change in sea level of 20
> > feet or so. That's not going to happen. There isn't enough ice even if both
> > icecaps melted down to nothing.
> 
> Au Contraire:
> 
> "If larger ice sheets begin to recede, sea level could rise rapidly and
> dramatically. The most vulnerable ice sheet is the marine-based West Antarctic
> Ice Sheet which contains enough water locked up as ice to raise global
> sea-level ~ 5 - 6 meters."

Which is enough to cover most of the coastal cities all over the world.

> This is quoted from the USGS page Chris Tracey posted.  Now, I don't agree
> with
> Shiri that this could happen in a matter of years, but if we don't try to curb
> what we put in the atmosphere, it could easily happen in another 50-100 years,
> IMO.  I do believe the earth is currently in a natural warming trend; however,
> I also believe we have sped this process up.

Well, I don't know exactly how many years.

> > I'll give Chris's words some credence but you're just scaremongering, try not
> > to believe everything you read.

I don't believe everything I read, no. I do believe researches that are well
based on facts, yes.

> I'd like to hear where you read there wasn't enough ice in the caps to raise
> the sea level much.

Me too.

> I saw a report (on the Discovery channel, I believe) that
> at one point, millions of years ago, the sea level was a couple *hundred* feet
> higher, due to the fact that there were no ice caps.

This is well known. Don't know about you guys, but I used to live on a
mountain which was 700 meters (not feet) high. There were fossils of sea-
creatures all over the place, not only loose ones but some that were on huge
slabs of stone. What our environmental studies teachers (it was a mandatory
subject in my elementary school, all through 6th grade) taught about this was
that whole area used to be covered with sea-water. I don't know if it was due
to the fact that there were no icecaps; but that sounds reasonable.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes: I give on the icecaps, ok? If they all melt at once, we're all going wading. You still have to show that they're all going to melt, though. Won't take much, a few degrees higher average temp should do (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) feet (...) That entirely depends on the geology of the local area - it could be sea level changes or it could be the land itself varying due to tectonic activity (trust a Californian to think along these lines). Bruce (26 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) a (...) Au Contraire: "If larger ice sheets begin to recede, sea level could rise rapidly and dramatically. The most vulnerable ice sheet is the marine-based West Antarctic Ice Sheet which contains enough water locked up as ice to raise global (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR