To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5624
5623  |  5625
Subject: 
Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 10 May 2000 19:28:53 GMT
Viewed: 
691 times
  
Jeff Stembel wrote:
I'd like to hear where you read there wasn't enough ice in the caps to raise
the sea level much.  I saw a report (on the Discovery channel, I believe) that
at one point, millions of years ago, the sea level was a couple *hundred* feet
higher, due to the fact that there were no ice caps.

Jeff is correct. See my last post(5623).
For general information- scientists measure the amount of ice on the
planet at a given time by looking at oxygen isotope ratio in deepsea
sediment cores.  ^16-O is selectively stored in ice over the heavier
^18-O.  When you see more ^16-O in the sediment cores you can tell
the climate was warmer, when there is less or none- it was
colder.  This is the main method scientist use to estimate that
factor in past climates.

-chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) a (...) Au Contraire: "If larger ice sheets begin to recede, sea level could rise rapidly and dramatically. The most vulnerable ice sheet is the marine-based West Antarctic Ice Sheet which contains enough water locked up as ice to raise global (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR