Subject:
|
Re: Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:50:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
871 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.faq, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > I've seen people say things similar to that before
>
> [ie, "sorry to follow myself up]
>
> > but I've never understood
> > what has led to them feel that way. I don't think there's any such stigma
> > here (there shouldn't be!) about replying to one's own post. (Maybe there
> > is out on Usenet?)
>
> There is on Usenet. I'm not sure exactly where it comes from, but it is bad
> nettiquette. I *think* it's to prevent one person from keeping a thread alive
> when no one else cares.
>
> At any rate, I have seen people flame each other for doing it, but only rarely
> if the "violator" either answers his own question or somehow corrects his
> previous post.
>
> I know that whenever I do it I give a nod to nettiquette and acknowledge that
> I'm breaking it, even with a good reason.
Why was this followed up to debate? I don't see anything controversial!
:-) Seems like good elaboration for the FAQ.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|