Subject:
|
Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 15:23:15 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com#AvoidSpam#
|
Viewed:
|
173 times
|
| |
|
|
Arguably, we went to the moon about 10 years too early using the man in
a can technology. DynaSoar would have been a much better way to go and
we'd now have a big industrial infrastructure in LEO and commercial
flights from NY to Tokyo in 5 hours or less, as well as an active moon
base that was a commercial success and be well on our way to colonizing
Mars.
Instead of a slow fire building to an inferno we shot off a firecracker
and have less to show for it.
That's the thesis of a lot of near future novels that I enjoy, anyway.
One I'm reading now is Firestar, which blends education into the mix
rather nicely.
Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> In lugnet.space, John J. Ladasky, Jr. writes:
> > The United States was in a race with the Soviet Union for bragging rights.
> > The USA landed on the Moon first, thereby winning the pi**ing contest. The
> > USSR bowed out of any further space competitions (in fact, claiming that a
> > manned moon landing was never one of their goals!), thereby taking away the
> > Americans' will to strive for more. We humans have this problem -- it's not
> > as much fun to achieve something, if you're not simultaneously BEATING
> > someone.
>
> Carl Sagan observed in an interview about 10 years ago that the "Space Race"
> was over, and that the U.S. had lost. In the grand scheme, the moon landing,
> though great propaganda, was less significant than the long-term manned
> missions of the U.S.S.R.
>
> Dave!
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
| (...) Carl Sagan observed in an interview about 10 years ago that the "Space Race" was over, and that the U.S. had lost. In the grand scheme, the moon landing, though great propaganda, was less significant than the long-term manned missions of the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
