Subject:
|
Re: memes (Was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Mar 2000 22:47:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1152 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Erik Olson writes:
> [...]
> Anyway, it's time to wrap up this essay. I think there is a time to
> label something a meme, but only when you want to emphasize its
> propogation and nothing deeper.
Ya, that's what I meant earlier when I mentioned that religions were memes.
I'm always curious how religions manage to propagate themselves. Thus, it
doesn't seem surprising to me that a religion with a first commandment in
which its deity disavows the existence of other deities would end up being
a dominant player in the religions market.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
| (...) I think the strategy is also to announce the desirable features of Messiah 2.0 and then not actually ship it. When others announce their version of Messiah, threaten them. Of course, a significant portion of the user base hasn't even (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
