 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Dan Boger
| | | | (...) me (...) how (...) on (...) toss (...) well - didn't you say that you feel god's interest? I never felt that, and never saw anything to even make me begin to think that... (...) when (...) first of all, I did read all through the old testament (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
| | | | | | (...) Yes, according to Matthew 1:1-17, He was. It's way too long to write here, but it gives "X was the son of Y" all of the way from Abraham to Jesus. Well, technically Jesus wasn't related to Joseph, but that's close enough. Ben Roller (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Peter Callaway
| | | | | (...) The plight of the Israelites throughout the Old Testament is proof that he cared about them. He constantly refers to them as his "Chosen People". The fact that he sent Jesus to earth to do what He did is even more proof. I'm not talking warm (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Dan Boger
| | | | | (...) Again, you're assuming that events described in the bible are exactly as described, and were written down objectivly. The bible, however, was written by people who did believe in a God that led then through the desert etc, etc, etc. That makes (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
