Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:54:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1041 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Peter Callaway writes:
> P.S. This political correctness thing with calling God "she" is pathetic.
It's equally pathetic to believe that God is a male. You're limiting the
supreme power with gender.
> There is no mention anywhere in anyone's Bible of "she" when
Don't be so sure of yourself. I've seen translations that use Mother and She
instead of He. I don't need that, but if I had a twisted understanding of
fathers (if my dad was absent and I equated fathers with absence for example)
then I'd probably not like the "regular" Bible.
God is God is God..gender is irrelevant.
Ben Roller
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) This is true. God the Holy Spirit is not gender specific. But Greek and Hebrew original writings speak of God the Father and God the Son as well. You can't argue about God the Son - Jesus was a man. God the Father is what Jesus called Him, and (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) of (...) That's what makes God even more amazing. The fact that He is all powerful and all knowing and all creating, and yet desires to have a relationship with us all. He has stated this countless times throughout history. His greatest (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
