To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4422
4421  |  4423
Subject: 
Re: Mormon bashing again
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 20:50:51 GMT
Viewed: 
823 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:


Not to mention that there
is no evidence of intermediary life forms necessary to support the THEORY -
only clearly delineated specific and vastly different species that • reproduce
"after their kind" just like the primitive bible states.

Anti-logic.  Again, your position is depending on what evolutionary theory • lacks.

Incidentally, the "intermediary life-forms" argument is an old chestnut in • the
Creationist trove--it dates from before the discovery of Archaeopteryx, from • before
the discovery of late synapsid reptiles (the intermediaries between reptiles • and
mammals--palaeontologists *still* can't decide what they were) and from • before
the
theory of punctuated equilibrium.

And they have in fact found intermediary forms that predate Archaeopteryx
recently in China (or was it Mongolia, sorry, I forget).  A more definite mix
of dinosaur and bird.

There are plenty of intermediary forms; the creationist simply do not admit to
them.

Bruce

These were also admitted to be a hoax shortly after being released.

Bill



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Mormon bashing again
 
(...) - (...) to (...) See what I mean? If you mean the proto-birds, that's not true (your source, please). If you mean something else, you'll have to clue me in since I mention no other specific example and neither do you. Bruce (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mormon bashing again
 
(...) lacks. (...) before (...) and (...) the (...) And they have in fact found intermediary forms that predate Archaeopteryx recently in China (or was it Mongolia, sorry, I forget). A more definite mix of dinosaur and bird. There are plenty of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR