To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4429
4428  |  4430
Subject: 
Re: Mormon bashing again
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 21:11:58 GMT
Viewed: 
831 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:


Not to mention that there
is no evidence of intermediary life forms necessary to support the THEORY • -
only clearly delineated specific and vastly different species that • reproduce
"after their kind" just like the primitive bible states.

Anti-logic.  Again, your position is depending on what evolutionary theory • lacks.

Incidentally, the "intermediary life-forms" argument is an old chestnut in • the
Creationist trove--it dates from before the discovery of Archaeopteryx, from • before
the discovery of late synapsid reptiles (the intermediaries between reptiles • and
mammals--palaeontologists *still* can't decide what they were) and from • before
the
theory of punctuated equilibrium.

And they have in fact found intermediary forms that predate Archaeopteryx
recently in China (or was it Mongolia, sorry, I forget).  A more definite mix
of dinosaur and bird.

There are plenty of intermediary forms; the creationist simply do not admit • to
them.

Bruce

These were also admitted to be a hoax shortly after being released.

Bill

See what I mean?

If you mean the proto-birds, that's not true (your source, please).  If you
mean something else, you'll have to clue me in since I mention no other
specific example and neither do you.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Mormon bashing again
 
(...) I heard it on the radio news - AP or USA - they were going to exhibit them and then it was announced that they were fake. Best I can do. Bill (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mormon bashing again
 
(...) reproduce (...) the (...) before (...) These were also admitted to be a hoax shortly after being released. Bill (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR