 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) No you're not. There's just such a vast conceptual gulf between those that think that man is innately evil and those that think that he is innately good, that you may never be able to bridge it, distracting and disingenious accusations of (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Agreed, as someone who's often on the other side(1), you're both doing a good job (generally) of getting your points across. Where the communication breaks down is at base level assumptions, and the fact that the medium is slightly awkward for (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I also happen to disagree that Christian belief necessitates "man is innately evil." That's because my religion descends from a Christian belief that believes that man is innately good (though most people in my religion do not consider (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'd disagree there, as well. Well, ok, sort of. I would suggest that many mainstream Christians have this belief, but that it is a misinterpretation of what mainstream Christian churches(1) are teaching - namely that man is inherently (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
