Subject:
|
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 20:56:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.%IHateSpam%com
|
Viewed:
|
2541 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:55:15 GMT, Christopher Weeks
> <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote:
>
> > 5) Let peaceful people cross borders freely.
> > OK, I can see otherwise reasonable people disagreeing with this
> > due to outmoded notions of fealty and sovereignty. I agree with
> > the LP stance on this issue and am more extreme than this, but
> > this is the only one of the personal issues that I bet many
> > folks would disagree with.
>
> Yup. There are very good reasons not to let economic refugees cross
> into your country freely. Most especially if you are richer than your
> neighbours.
And if you give government assistance to those who are in need. Absent
that, there is no good reason.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) Yup. There are very good reasons not to let economic refugees cross into your country freely. Most especially if you are richer than your neighbours. (...) The problem isn't that the market wouldn't provide food. It's that the market would not (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
