To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3862
3861  |  3863
Subject: 
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:40:04 GMT
Viewed: 
2549 times
  
Jasper "I didn't invent Libertarianism, I just laugh at" Janssen wrote in
message... <38b4684b.609370836@lugnet.com>...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:55:15 GMT, Christopher "Everyone is a Libertarian" • Weeks
<clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote:
<Mega snip>
   Jasper's post is evidence of my case.  Even though Jasper is from a
country currently more to the left than ours, his opinions are more moderate
than most of the people who I talk politics with here in the US, and he is
still very Left/Liberal/Social on the Libertarian quiz.
This is the only on of the five I agree with, actually.

   Not surprising to me. I have seen people disagree with all of my answers
(which are similar to Chris'...)

So, basically, I think the personal side is well designed and the
economic side should be rewritten so that it places more people in the
libertarian camp.  Even as it's set up, if you answer
Y_Y_Y_Y_M_M_Y_N_M_Y which is a reasonable answer, you fall out as a
libertarian.

Why does it need to be set up so that everyone is conned into
believing they're libertarian? Very intellectually dishonest tactic.

   Well, if it was there goal to take ignorant people, and twist their
thoughts into fitting their politics, I am sure the libertarians would do
that (and some probably do, its pretty common in the political arena).  I am
glad to see they have not done that, at least in this instance.

I don't know.  In a global context, I think we're fairly conservative.
And fairly moderate.  Both parties agree on more than they disagree.  In
some places that's less true - as I understand it.

More thasn fairly. Both your parties are extremely moderate by your
own standards, and both are right-wing by global standards (by
actions, not words, that is).

   Apples/Oranges.  When choosing between two evils, I pick the one I
haven't tried before.

My circle is pretty small.  I know a great many more netizens than • fleshizens.

It's easier to know a lot of the one than to know a lot of the other.
For one thing, 100 people in a crowded newsgroup doesn't mean you
can't hear the other guy talk.

   Good point.  I hear what your saying.
Jasper

--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Yup. There are very good reasons not to let economic refugees cross into your country freely. Most especially if you are richer than your neighbours. (...) The problem isn't that the market wouldn't provide food. It's that the market would not (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR