Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:26:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@^AntiSpam^novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
2330 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:09:34 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have
> > monopoly on the initiation of the use of force, while corporations are
> > limited in what similar powers they can have, or so one would hope.
>
> Which is why you need said government fairly strong to be able to make
> sure those corporations _don't_ start doing things like that.
As you're so fond of saying, that's not the only solution. I'd posit:
not even close to the best one.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| <387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
