To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3860
3859  |  3861
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 02:54:56 GMT
Viewed: 
4710 times
  
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:17:14 GMT, Christopher Weeks
<clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote:

> I agree that direct responsibility will either be unclear or made
> unclear in most cases.  And I think the solution is to err on the side
> of inclusion rather than exclusion.  The point is to make people careful.

Right. Guilty until proven innocent.

Don't do this, please.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
<38850672.B6A753EE@eclipse.net> <FoK7Jv.LHr@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I think I'm willing to largely agree that those things will increase also. Paperwork for sure...and that's a (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR