To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3860
3859  |  3861
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 02:54:56 GMT
Viewed: 
2339 times
  
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:17:14 GMT, Christopher Weeks
<clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote:

I agree that direct responsibility will either be unclear or made
unclear in most cases.  And I think the solution is to err on the side
of inclusion rather than exclusion.  The point is to make people careful.

Right. Guilty until proven innocent.

Don't do this, please.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
<38850672.B6A753EE@eclipse.net> <FoK7Jv.LHr@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I think I'm willing to largely agree that those things will increase also. Paperwork for sure...and that's a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR