Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 02:53:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2303 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:23:30 GMT, Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> Perhaps they shouldn't have dumped stuff, which they didn't know what
> its effects might be, in an unsecured area. Think about how we handle
> radioactive waste. Some of it, we don't really know what effect it will
> have, so be bundle it up to make sure it doesn't leak.
Oh come now. You're acting like it never happens that a
previously-thought-unharmful stuff is later considered extremely
harmful. cf Asbestos. Greatest thing since sliced bread, right up
until the fourties when the studies came out.
I really don't think it would be fair to necessarily have the person
who installed something be financially responsible.
That's the type of _completely_ random liability this world needs less
of, not more.
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Perhaps they shouldn't have dumped stuff, which they didn't know what its effects might be, in an unsecured area. Think about how we handle radioactive waste. Some of it, we don't really know what effect it will have, so be bundle it up to (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
