 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | <387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Yup, one would - and that is the current set-up. But I believe(1) that I was responding to an impression that governments are evil because they'll do this, but corporations aren't, because they won't. James (URL) hunting through the thread for (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) Which is why you need said government fairly strong to be able to make sure those corporations _don't_ start doing things like that. Jasper (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) As you're so fond of saying, that's not the only solution. I'd posit: not even close to the best one. (24 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
