Subject:
|
Re: An Alternative..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jan 2000 00:14:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
311 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Franks writes:
> These communities would meet regularly (at least once a week), and would act
> on a social and political level.
By this I don't mean that they would all meet - there would be a meeting and
anyone who wanted could attend.
> People could drop in once a week,
Although a more practical idea may be internet-voting, or they may sign up to
have a list of things voted to them mailed whenever they come up.
Individuals would also be allowed to vote on a range of town, region, state and
country issues. Issues out of the scope of the community would be graded on a
basis according to their percieved relevence. This is to let the individual
choose the level of involvement-notification they want.
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: An Alternative..
|
| (...) Please don't hold back on the questions :) (...) I have to respectfully disagree! * Power is bottom up, not top down. * State Funding is at a minimum - you pay for what you want. * Individuals are offered a role in community issues and at a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
