Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:39:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1386 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > Instead of taking potshots at ideas posited by others and claiming you're
> > entitled to this, and entitled to that, and entitled to the other thing • too,
> > why don't you tell US what your solution is? I'd love to hear it. More
> > government spending, perhaps?
>
> I don't think that asking questions, or even giving examples of situations • that
> might give a particular idea problems can really be called potshots.
>
> A lot of the other stuff that's been flying around certainly could be.
I should control myself, but I'm evil! (1) Sorry about that. Seriously,
why don't you answer his question??? Or, was "more government spending" the
correct answer?
1 - I admit, I am not perfect. I said yesterday, in response to MM, that I
would start back at square -37 and go from there, but I've been kinda busy
today, and it seemed like I would have to write a whole book to show you.
Instead, I have been getting a kick out of your game, so I played. I'll
probably get serious as soon as you do... (or sooner)
--
Have fun!
John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
