To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3570
3569  |  3571
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 03:54:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1171 times
  
   Matthew, give me the link to the post you needed answered.  It is long
gone... Thanks

--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/
John DiRienzo wrote in message ...
Matthew Miller wrote in message ...
John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
were, before, either.  The reason I've been so impolite in these past few
posts (moreso than is typical for my normally cynical self) is because • every
post (from you and others) I read in this thread that was against what I
believe has been filled with sarcasm and ridicule.  And, mostly you have

Yes, I posted some things in a sarcastic tone. That doesn't mean I wasn't
serious. But the fact that you weren't amused underlines the point that we
disagree at an extremely basic level. So discussing the question of rights
makes a lot of sense.

If you want to allude to state-controlled totalitarian distopias, I • probably
will see the humor in it. Despite your label of "commie", I don't advocate • a
state-controlled society (which is what I take it you mean by that) and I
don't think I've suggested that as a solution at all.

But really: let's look at the basic issues of rights first, at the bare
stand-alone level, and see where that gets us.


  Thanks, we will. Good night.
--
  Have fun!
  John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) This is what I meant in specific: (URL) there's actually two true/false statements which go before that. Just give an agree/disagree (or a mostly agree/mostly disagree) (I mostly disagree with both, btw -- see my reply to the above post for (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) every (...) probably (...) a (...) Thanks, we will. Good night. -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR